Ideagen Quality Management (2024)

• Branche: Lagerung
• Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
• Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
• Quelle der Bewertung

Vorteile

When I first joined my company it was a privately owned company, however, now 6 years later, the business has massively grown with a number of acquisitions and having made the move to become a public company. With the acquisitions, the ease of having Q-Pulse Enterprise allowed us to roll out the QMS and provide real live data and streamline a number of our processes.

Nachteile

Due to the number of employees that I currently work with, and working in a quality and compliance industry, that training is core to the success of the business. Having a platform that can demonstrate this is critical. Whilst Q-Pulse currently offers way of documenting training, I do believe it is quite manual and could improve. If this improves, Q-Pulse will prove to be a very robust and attractive quality management system.

Annabelle

• Branche: Baumaterial
• Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
• Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
• Quelle der Bewertung

Vorteile

Ease off use
Ability to run from IPad's and phones
Flexibility of being able to tailor to own needs
Dashboard for tracking performance
Easy administration

Nachteile

Audits process is long winded and could be simplified by being able to raise on close on the app.

Modules are not interactive with each other and operate independently.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

EHS Software

Warum Ideagen Quality Management gewählt wurde

Previous system was no longer supported and users were not happy with it. Lost all buy in and employees deviated from the system so losing visibility of the EHSQ performance from a central function.

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Ideagen Quality Management

Locality of organisationUser friendlyProce

Stephen

• Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
• Quelle der Bewertung

Vorteile

The ability to configure the system is made very simple. Changes can be made by administrators with minimal effort which is invaluable to any business which is either growing or operates in a dynamic environment.
The software has constant releases either for fixes (which obviously everyone wants to avoid altogether) or for improvements. We have seen several iterations of a module in the space of a year which has helped how our users engage with the system.
On a similar note, I am impressed with how the company will make changes to the software upon request. Changes are reviewed and implemented in a timely fashion.

Nachteile

Having to re-create successful pilot projects from UAT to the Live site is a frustration!
Whilst I have praised the configurability of the system I believe there are further improvements which could be made to enhance the software further.
The module nature of the software has meant some modules are behind others in terms of aesthetics and functionality (but I know this is something the business is working on).

James

• Branche: Kunststoffe
• Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
• Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
• Quelle der Bewertung

Vorteile

1) Easy to configure
2) Simple to use
3) Clever features (progress dashboards, document links etc)..
4) Document review reminders
5) Users can give feedback on controlled documents

Nachteile

The reports are not configurable enough for our processes

• Branche: Forschung
• Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
• Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
• Quelle der Bewertung

Vorteile

The flexibility of the Qualtrax software is by far the biggest selling point. The customizable and configurable workflows have helped our organization go almost entirely paper free in our Change Control, Deviation, CAPA and A/P invoice process. We are also looking to add additional workflows in the near future for software access and Action Item tracking.

Nachteile

There are some limitations with reporting on training matrices that are a bit frustrating as we have to manually track training curriculums.